Wednesday, November 05, 2008

post election thoughts

what else can i say than that i'm disappointed.

it's not obama, really, we just knew that he would win (did you see his following on facebook alone?) and if you recall, i was considering voting for him myself, a while back. it's nothing personal, but the bottom line is that we're a military family (my brother-in-law usmc sergent (now, right?) evan vanover did two tours of iraq post 9/11) and that really changes your view on politics. okay, yes, i've always been a liberal republican, but i do agree with the war, and i do not think we should bring troops home. they need to be there. they are defending our freedom, we will not accept defete. perhaps i should also mention that i am still one of the very few bush supporters left. yes, obama, i will support you, too. i may complain, but i do not bash presidents. (now, governors, on the other hand...)

the bigger upset, was in my local politics. at my precinct, i heard the most discouraging comments from those waiting in line- a few, first time voters at 25, 40, 50 years old. there were saying things such as "this one really counts," and "we need to Change, you know." a few were turned away for falsifying documents, some for failing to change an address, and others for not registering. "you know, you have to register every year to vote" someone else chimed in. REALLY? REALLY? so when there is a calling to vote in a historical election, people suddenly jump in our little democratic community- needing to Change. and that just pisses me off, since this record-breaking turnout in over a century was still only at 64%. where the hell is everyone else? frustrating. but at least it was above forty percent. but i digress. as i stepped up to the table to receive my ballot, i realized that they gave me no instructions. the ballot was long and complicated. there was no bold black line dividing the straight-ticket voting area from the rest of the ballot. because i usually vote mixed-ballot, i didn't think much of it, but i then wondered how many irregular voters marked the democrat straight-ticket area, and yet still proceeded to color in all of the other ovals. again, frustrating. i fault the volunteers, though i am certain that the outcome would have been the same.

the worst of all, came in my local politics. namely, the position of village president. we were afraid that our candidate would lose to village family, because a third candidate (with poor spelling and a lack of world history, mind you) would split his votes. indeed, that's what happened. and the village will be forced to be run by the same damn family members that have been running it for nearly a century. the good news, is that we have a killer board, and of course, an embarrassing level of experience with village president recalls, should there be any issues.

my man john accivitti also lost his run for state representive, a significant loss that i feel was created by all of the dirty, negative media that the michigan republican party was flooding my mailbox with. it sure seemed downright nasty. it probably even crossed the line, and yet, the ads were coming from the mrp, and not john himself. i did get a nice letter opener out of the deal, though, but i am incredibly dissappointed.

and finally, stem-cell research passed by an unnerving margin. will someone please put in some serious guidelines to this? though we surely need cures to disease, we don't need clones, and fetal testing. we need ethics.

perhaps that is really the bottom line. we just all need ethics.

god bless america.

10 comments:

Jeremy said...

I'm equally disappointed with the results of the local election. With the vote getting split, it's once again put another "family member" into the position of president.

Given the track record, I'm sure he'll be out before his term is up, thanks to the wack-pack who organize these annual recall efforts.

I am pleased that there is going to be a solid board, since the President is only entitled to one vote, the rest of the board will pretty much take away any voting power he has, and I'm confident that they all have the best interests of the village in mind.

Oh well. I'm not going to comment on anything else, because we're just like oil and water, and we're never going to mix on those issues.

But hey, it's over, we know the results, and all we can do is focus on what really matters - that we're all Americans working towards a common goal....

free ice cream and coffee!

Anonymous said...

Accivitti only losing by 1231 votes tells me there should have been a few more "negative" mailings. that's the ONLY thing that moved numbers this cycle. "negative" campaigning works. sorry.

meagan said...

Meagan said...

i found the recent ads to be atrocious, and i never once considered voting for his opponent, jennifer haase. political history or not, i'm not a fan of mudslinging, and never will be. however, i will admit, it does apparently work.

it's especially important to note that you are not from the area and obviously did not see the printed ads. one featured haase as a marionette being controlled by the hands of special interest groups and in her hand were stacks and stacks for hundred dollar bills. this really was the begining of it.

in the future, please do not leave anonymous comments.

thank you.

ool-44c6f68f.dyn.optonline.net 68.198.246.143

Anonymous said...

My thoughts exactly Meagan. I knew before the local election even happened what was going to happen, the the votes would be split. At least we have a good board now.

As for the President...it is going to be an interesting road ahead! (Not sure that is a good thing.)

Anonymous said...

I am hoping that our board is strong. Are any of them, besides our village president, part of the old regime?
I swear my husband wanted to get the moving truck, as he is very worried about the village being run by a guy who stood on his sidelines years ago in a purple suit.
It is very frustrating that the vote was split. I hope we will be okay.

Meagan Vanover, CWP said...

oh jj, tell me you're kidding...

Anonymous said...

I was somewhat against the stem cell proposal until I learned the following about the legislation:

'Restrictions in the amendment address the moral concerns of the pro-life argument. For instance, only those embryos left over from fertility treatments and scheduled for destruction can be used and only those that were specifically donated by the patient. Additionally, the embryos can only be used within 14 days after cell division begins, and embryos cannot be bought or sold.'

Really the moral issue here is why did we agree that leftover embryos from fertility testing would be destroyed? At least the stem cell proposal uses them for something constructive.

Also, legally, stem cell research can't lead to human cloning.

Obamoose

Meagan Vanover, CWP said...

good to know, about the cloning. here was my one big ethical issue:

how long do they hang onto these embryos? are there half-grown babies floating around in labs for years? i always considered donating my body to science until in college, as a science major, i learned of a leg that had been poked and prodded since the 1960's. that's just sick.

as a mom, i found myself envisioning deformed fetuses and stuff. sick.

and currently, no cures have been found from this type of research. i have a friend who's sister had a rare disease and benefited from stem cells years ago, but it's just not quite there.

when i had ky (and tegan) i looked into cord blood donating (because lord knows i can't afford to bank it for personal use) but my hospital did not participate, so all of this valuable free research is then disposed of.

perhaps this proposal can collect some of that?

Anonymous said...

I wish I was kidding about the purple suit (did I mention the feather in the hat too?). I swear, I hope the board is strong, as I thought Todd was going to pack up the house when he found out the results.

Anonymous said...

I think the embryos are kept for 7-14 days before destruction.

Moose